Models - Calculation of airflow
Back to Start | Next (Calculation of heat flow)
TABLE OF CONTENT
- Calculation of airflow
- Rail tunnel section (RailSection)
- Road tunnel section (RoadSection)
- Platform (Platform)
- Plenum (Plenum)
- Tunnel entry (Entry)
- Tunnel portal (Portal)
- Recirculation (Recirc)
- Tunnel junction (Branch)
- Supply or exhaust fan to ambient (FanDuct)
- Leak (Leak)
- Given volume airflow (VFGiven)
- Filter (Filter)
- Damper (Damper)
- Passage (Passage)
- Axial fan (AxialFan)
- Saccardo nozzle (SaccarNoz)
The models
Calculation of airflow
The airflow in any section of the tunnel system is derived from balances of air mass flow and total pressure for the whole tunnel. The unsteady flow energy equation is the basis for the calculations and the energy losses (or gains) are modeled similarly to normal pipe flow calculations.
Loss coefficients are in some cases calculated by the program, but can also be given by the program user. The present lack of detailed knowledge for some of the airflow configurations has been overcome by continuity assumptions and comparisons to measurements of loss coefficients.
Rail tunnel section (RailSection)
In the tunnel section model the length is divided at nodes into segments. Each segment has constant cross section area and hydraulic diameter. The expressions of the different pressure contributions are in all essentials the same as those used in the SES program [SES User’s Manual 1997] and described in [Harris 1973] and [DOT 1997].
Note that in the computation of pressure changes due to friction and piston action we neglect the effect of vehicles side by side.
The different contributions from segments are
where
| Δpfrict | pressure change due to friction against walls (Pa) | dPFrict | |
| λTi | Darcy friction factor for tunnel wall in segment i | lambda | |
| ρi | mean density of air in tunnel segment i (kg/m3) | Rho | |
| di | hydraulic diameter of tunnel segment i (m) | dTun | |
| li | length of tunnel segment i (m) | lTun | |
| l V_ij | length of vehicles of type j in tunnel segment i (m) | lBody | |
| vi | mean air velocity in segment i, positive from left to right (m/s) | VAir | |
| vV_ij | velocity for vehicle j in segment i, positive from left to right (m/s) | speed | |
| AV_j | cross section area of vehicle type j (m2) | frontArea | |
| Ai | tunnel area of segment i (m2) | aTun | |
| λs_k | loss coefficient for sign type k | lambda2 |
| Δpstack | stack pressure rise (Pa) | dPStack | |
| Δpstack_i | stack pressure rise in segment i(Pa) | dPStack | |
| pstack_i+1 | PStack | ||
| pstack_1 | static pressure in left node of section (Pa) | PStack | |
| Δhi | change of altitude in segment i (m) | dH | |
| g | 9.80665 = acceleration of gravity (m/s2) | ||
| Ti | air temperature at node i (˚C) | TAir | |
| R | 287 = gas constant for air (J/kg/K) |
If one is interested in the average velocity around the train in a tunnel segment, it would be:
This velocity takes the train body into account in the continuity equation and provides the average real velocity around the train. IDA Tunnel calculates this velocity for a maximum of two trains in a segment because the 1D approximation for this velocity around two or more trains is far from accurate. The importance of this physical aspect of velocity lies in its direction, which can be opposite to the direction of train movement.
| Δpfire | pressure drop across fire (Pa) | ||
| FPD | pressure drop across fire per MW of fire power (Pa/MW) | FPD | |
| qfire | actual fire power (see 2.2.6) (W) | ||
| δi | if fire in segment i then if |mdot_i/Ai| > 0.1 sign(mdot_i) else sin(π/2·mdot_i /Ai /0.1) else 0 | ||
| mdot_i | air mass flow in segment i (kg/s) | m_dot |
where
| Δpfricv | pressure change due to friction against vehicles (Pa) | dPFricv | |
| λV_j | skin friction coefficient for vehicles of type j | lambda | |
| λVS_j | skin friction coefficient related to viscous drag for vehicles of type j | lambdas | |
| cDTV_j | drag coefficient weighted total truck area of vehicle type j (m2) | cdTruck | |
| l V_j | length of vehicles of type j (m) | length | |
| p V_j | perimeter of vehicles of type j (m) | Perim |
where
| Δppiston | piston pressure rise (Pa) | dPPiston | |
| cDBV_j | drag coefficient at back end of vehicle type j | cdBack | |
| cDFV_j | drag coefficient at front end of vehicle type j | cdFront | |
| Nfront_ij | # of front ends (see below) of vehicle type j in segment i | nFront | |
| Nback_ij | # of back ends (see below) of vehicle type j in segment i | nBack |
front end is here defined as the end, either physical front or back, which has headwind
Thus the aerodynamic drag force on each vehicle becomes (omitting indices for vehicle and segment)
where
The contributions from nodes, which cause discontinuities in pressure profile along the section, are
dPArea
where ρi = density of air at node i (kg/m3) Rho
vi = air velocity at node i (with area Ai), positive from left to right (m/s) VAir
ζi = resistance factor at node i, depending on areas, shape of transition, and direction of flow. This factor is expressed in terms of expansion/contraction loss coefficients and areas of surrounding segments. Loss coefficients are related to smallest segment area. If areas are equal contraction loss coefficient is valid for positive direction and expansion loss coefficient for negative direction.
if Ai / Ai-1 > 1 and vi > 0 kPos
if Ai / Ai-1 > 1 and vi < 0 kNeg
if Ai / Ai-1 ≤ 1 and vi > 0 kPos
if Ai / Ai-1 ≤ 1 and vi < 0 kNeg
kexp_i = expansion loss coefficient at node i kExp
kcnt_i = contraction loss coefficient at node i kCntr
Ai = cross section area at node i = cross section area of segment to the right (m2)
thrust control
speed control
| Δpfan | fan pressure rise (Pa) | dPFan | |
| δij | 1 if fans j is in node i, otherwise 0 | ||
| kf_j | Nfan_j · kfan_j · Afan_j / Ai = efficiency factor of fans j | kF | |
| Nfan_j | number of jet fans j at node i | mult | |
| Afan_j | cross section area of jet fan j (m2) | area | |
| kfan_j | pressure rise coefficient (installation factor) of jet fan j | ||
| vf_j | cact_j· vfan_j = outlet velocity of fan j, positive from left to right (m/s) | ||
| cact_j | -τ·dcact_j /dt + ctr_j = delayed fan capacity control | cntrAct | |
| ctr_j | fan capacity control in interval [-1, 1], -1 = right to left action | cntr | |
| τ | time constant for startup (s) | tau | |
| vfan_j | jet speed of fan j (m/s) | v | |
| Qf_j | = | Nfan_j · Afan_j ·ρi · vfan_j 2 / Tpfan_j i · | cact_j | if thrust control Nfan_j · Afan_j ·ρi · vfan_j 2 / Tpfan_j i · cact_j 2; if speed control power consumption of fans j (W) | PowerCons [kW] |
| Tpfan_j | total performance (thrust/fan power ratio) of fan j (N/W). | TotPerform [N/kW] |
The air density ρi at node i is assumed to satisfy the perfect gas law
where
| R | 287 = gas constant for air (J/kg/K) | |||
| pi | static pressure at node i (Pa) | |||
| Ti | air temperature at node i (˚C). | TAir | ||
The air density ρi in a segment i satisfies the gas law with a pressure which is the mean of the pressures at the end nodes of the segment.
The relation between mass flow mdot_i, positive from left to right, and the velocity vi at node i or in a segment i, is given by
.
The tunnel area is initially computed at the nodes between the segments. As tunnel area of a segment the area at the left node of the segment is used.
Road tunnel section (RoadSection)
The road section model is very much alike the rail section model. The main difference occurs because there is another type of traffic: car traffic instead of train traffic. We will just list the differences.
where
| Δpfrict | pressure change due to friction against walls (Pa) | dPFrict | |
| λT | Darcy friction factor for tunnel wall | lambda | |
| ρi | mean density of air in tunnel segment i (kg/m3) | Rho | |
| di | hydraulic diameter of tunnel segment i (m) | dTun | |
| li | length of tunnel segment i (m) | lTun | |
| vi | mean air velocity in segment i, positive from left to right (m/s) | VAir |
where
| Δpfricv | pressure change due to friction against vehicles (Pa) |
where
| Δppiston | piston pressure rise (Pa) | dPPiston | |
| cDFV_j | drag coefficient at front end of vehicle type j | cdFront | |
| Nfront_ij | # of front ends of vehicle type j in segment i | nFront | |
| AV_j | cross section area of vehicle type j (m2) | frontArea | |
| Ai | tunnel area of segment i (m2). | aTun |
Platform (Platform)
In the platform the mass conservation is given by
where
| ρdry | density of dry air = ρ ·(1 + w) -1 (kg/m3) | RhoDry | |
| ρ | density of air (kg/ m3) | Rho | |
| w | humidity ratio of air | xHum | |
| mdot_j | mass flow from tunnel j (kg/s) | tunnel.m_dot | |
| mdot_leak | mass flow from leak (kg/s) | leak.m_dot | |
| V | volume of platform (m3). | VEncl |
The static pressure is given by
p = ρ·R·(T +273.15)
where
| T | air temperature in platform (˚C). | TAir |
Plenum (Plenum)
In the Plenum the mass conservation is given by
where
| ρdry | density of dry air = ·(1 + w) -1 (kg/m3) | RhoDry | |
| ρ | density of air (kg/ m3) | Rho | |
| w | humidity ratio of air ( = 0 in IDA RTV) | xHum | |
| mdot_j | mass flow from tunnel j (kg/s) | tunnel.m_dot | |
| V | volume of Plenum (m3). | VEncl |
The static pressure is given by
p = ρ·R·(T +273.15)
where
| T | air temperature in Plenum (˚C). | TAir |
Tunnel entry (Entry)
The tunnel entry is modeled as a flanged entrance for airflow moving into the tunnel and an abrupt exit for airflow moving out of the tunnel. The reduction of wind pressure due to a vehicle in the tunnel entry is neglected.
Assuming given total pressure pout outside the entry the Bernoulli equations become
for airflow entering the tunnel and
for airflow leaving the tunnel,
where
| pout | pheight + pwind = total pressure outside tunnel relative reference level (Pa) | P1 | |||
| ptunnel | static pressure inside tunnel relative reference level (Pa) | tunnel.P | |||
| pheight | PHeight | ||||
| pwind | wind pressure outside tunnel (Pa) | PWindCalc | |||
| pamb | ambient pressure at reference level (Pa) | amb.P | |||
| ρmean | mean air density at entry (kg/m3) | Rho | |||
| kc | loss coefficient for ingoing flow (into tunnel), default = 0.5 | kPos | |||
| kd | loss coefficient for outgoing flow (out of tunnel), default = 1 | kNeg | |||
| vtunnel | air velocity in tunnel inside entrance (m/s) | VAir | |||
| Tamb | ambient temperature (˚C) | amb.T | |||
| h | height relative reference level (m) | hTun | |||
| g | 9.80665 = acceleration of gravity (m/s2) | ||||
| R | 287 = gas constant for air (J/kg/K). | ||||
Tunnel portal (Portal)
Openings of tunnels to stations/plenums are modeled in the same way as tunnel entries regarding airflows. For airflow entering the tunnel Bernoulli equation become
and for airflow entering the station/plenum
where
| pstation | total pressure outside tunnel at floor level relative reference level (Pa) | station.P | |||
| pamb | ambient at reference level (Pa) | amb.P | |||
| Δpheight | static pressure relative station/plenum floor level (Pa) | dPHeight | |||
| ρmean | mean air density at portal (kg/m3) | Rho | |||
| kc | loss coefficient for flow entering tunnel, default = 0.5 | kPos | |||
| kd | loss coefficient for flow leaving tunnel, default = 1 | kNeg | |||
| vtunnel | air velocity in tunnel (m/s) | VAir | |||
| T | temperature in station/plenum (˚C) | station.T | |||
| h | height to tunnel from station floor (m) | hTun | |||
| g | 9.80665 = acceleration of gravity (m/s2) | ||||
| R | 287 = gas constant for air (J/kg/K). | ||||
Recirculation (Recirc)
A model for the situation where two tunnel entries are so close that airflowing out from one tunnel can re circulate into the other has been formulated. The model has two parameters, maximum percentage flowing from each entry to the other. The mass flows from one tunnel to the other is given by
and from ambient by
where
| mdot_1 | mass flow in tunnel 1 (positive out of tunnel) (kg/s) | tunnel1.m_dot | |
| mdot_2 | mass flow in tunnel 2 (positive out of tunnel) (kg/s) | tunnel2.m_dot | |
| mdot_21 | mass flow recirculating from tunnel 2 to tunnel 1 (kg/s) | m_dot2_1 | |
| mdot_12 | mass flow recirculating from tunnel 1 to tunnel 2 (kg/s) | m_dot1_2 | |
| mdot_a1 | mass flow from ambient to tunnel 1 (kg/s) | m_dota_1 | |
| mdot_a2 | mass flow from ambient to tunnel 2 (kg/s) | m_dota_2 | |
| f21 | maximum fraction of mass flow recirculating from tunnel 2 to tunnel 1 | part2_1 [%] | |
| f12 | maximum fraction of mass flow recirculating from tunnel 1 to tunnel 2. | part1_2 [%] |
Tunnel junction (Branch)
The models for the converging flows and diverging flows in the branching component are the ones derived by [Gardel 1957], used in [Wallin 1994], and valid for a wye consisting of a straight uniform section with a connected branch, with a possibly different cross section area.

One can distinguish between six cases of the flow pattern, four of which are covered by the original model by Gardel: converging flows (2, 3) to 1 and (3, 1) to 2 and diverging flows 1 to (2, 3) and 2 to (3, 1). The remaining two cases, converging to branch 3 and diverging from branch 3, are not described there but have been estimated by continuity to the other four cases and fitting to measurements (see below).
Denoting properties of flows at different locations by subscripts i, j and l, Bernoulli’s equations for the flow paths are written as follows.
Converging flow, (i, j) to l:
Diverging flow, i to (j, l):
where
| pi | static pressure at location i (Pa) | tun<i>.P, i=1,2,3 | |
| ρi | pi/(R·(T+273.15)) = density at location i (Pa) | Rho<i> | |
| vi | velocity at location i (positive inwards) (m/s) | VAir<i> | |
| kcil | loss coefficient for converging flow from i to l | K<il> | |
| kdil | loss coefficient for diverging flow from i to l | K<il> | |
| T | temperature (˚C). | T |
Depending on the flows the loss coefficients are computed as follows:
Converging flow, (2, 3) to 1, case 1:
K21
K31
Converging flow, (3, 1) to 2, case 2:
kc12 = formula for kc21 with subscripts 1 and 2 exchanged K12
and π - φ replaced by φ
k c32 = formula for kc31 with subscript 1 replaced by 2 and π - φ by φ K32
Diverging flow, 1 to (2, 3), case 4:
K12
K13
Diverging flow, 2 to (3, 1), case 5:
kd21 = formula for kd12 with subscripts 1 and 2 exchanged K21
kd23 = formula for kd13 with subscript 1 replaced by 2 and φ by - φ K23
where
| Qi | absolute value of volume flow at location i (m3/s) | |VFAir<i>| | |
| Ai | cross section area at location i (A1 = A2) (m2) | aTun<il> | |
| φ | angle between straight section 1 and branch 3, φ [π/4, 3π/4] | Fi [degree] | |
| r | radius of rounding at branch to main / diameter of main. | r |
To estimate the remaining loss coefficients, i.e. converging to branch 3 (case 3) and diverging from branch 3 (case 6), we utilize that the solutions should be continuous when flows change direction. This is the case for transitions between the above described cases. E.g. the transition between converging flow case 2 ((3, 1) to 2) and diverging flow case 4 (1 to (2, 3)), i.e. when Q3 = 0 we get by combining the above Bernoulli’s equations that
should be satisfied for continuity. If the densities are equal, ρ1 = ρ2, we see by inspecting the expressions for these loss coefficients that this is the case.
Now we require the same continuity properties for transitions where case 3 and case 6 (converging to and diverging from branch 3) are involved. From transition case 3 – case 4 (Q2 = 0) we get assuming that ρ1 = ρ3
and from transition case 3 – case 5 (Q1 = 0) we get assuming that ρ1 = ρ3
kc23|Q1=0 = formula for kc13|Q2=0 with subscripts 1 and 2 exchanged and replaced by π - φ
kc13|Q1=0 = formula for kc23|Q2=0 with subscript 2 replaced by 1.
In an analogous manner we derive coefficient for case 6 (3 to (1, 2)). From transition case 2 – case 6 (Q1 = 0) we get assuming that ρ1 = ρ3
and from transition case 1 – case 6 (Q2 = 0) we get assuming that ρ2 = ρ3
kd31|Q2=0 = formula for kd32|Q1=0 with subscripts 1 and 2 exchanged and φ replaced by π - φ
kd32|Q2=0 = formula for kd31|Q1=0 with subscript 2 replaced by 1 and φ by - φ.
The loss coefficients of the remaining two flow cases can now be approximated.
Converging flow, (1, 2) to 3, case 3:
K13
K23
Diverging flow, 3 to (1, 2), case 6:
K31
K32
When the cross-sectional area changes between segments 1 and 2, the abovementioned equations are modified by replacing A1 or A2 with 0.5(A1 + A2). This is a modification to Gardel’s equations.
Supply or exhaust fan to ambient (FanDuct)
The supply or exhaust duct is an extension of the branch with the model described below connected to branch 3 and to ambient. The model consists of a fan and optional damper. At no external Δp and fcntr = 1, the given flow (Vf_Nom) is obtained. When fcntr = 0 and DamperAtFanOff = Open, air will flow according to external Δp (including stack effect) with a system characteristic through the point phead and Vf_Nom. When fcntr = 0 and DamperAtFanOff = Closed, there is no airflow.
if fcntr > 0 or DamperAtFanOff = Open
=0 otherwise
where
| Vf | volume flow, negative for supply and positive for exhaust (m3/s) | VFAir | |||
| Vf_Nom | nominal volume airflow at no external pressure difference (m3/s) | VFNom | |||
| Δp |
total static pressure difference | dPtot | |||
| ptun | static pressure at tunnel relative ambient pressure at reference level (Pa) | tunnel.P | |||
| prise | static pressure rise in duct (Pa) | PRise | |||
| pheight | PHeight | ||||
| pn | if supply phead else -phead (Pa) | p_n | |||
| phead | static fan pressure at nominal flow (Pa) | pHead | |||
| fcntr | fan capacity control, 0 for no fan dp, 1 for phead (Pa) | fanCntr | |||
| pamb | ambient pressure at reference level (Pa) | amb.P | |||
| Tamb | ambient temperature (˚C) | amb.T | |||
| hamb | level of ambient opening (grille) relative to reference level (m) | hAmb | |||
| htun | tunnel level relative to reference level (m) | hTun | |||
| ρ | if Vf < 0 then ρamb else ρtunnel = air density (kg/m3) | Rho | |||
| T | if Vf < 0 then ρamb else ρtunnel = air temperature (˚C) | TAir | |||
| Ttunnel | temperature at branch to tunnel (˚C) | tunnel.T | |||
| ρnom | air density at which the fan performance is defined (kg/m3) | RhoNom | |||
| g | 9.80665 = acceleration of gravity (m/s2) | ||||
| R | 287 = gas constant for air (J/kg/K) | ||||
| Qsup | PowerSup kW] | ||||
| eff | fan efficiency. | effic | |||
Leak (Leak)
In a leak the relation between mass flow and pressure difference is given by
where
| mdot | mass flow to ambient (kg/s) | station.m_dot | |
| Cd | discharge coefficient | cd | |
| A | opening area (m2) | ar | |
| fopen | opening control, 1 for fully open and 0 for closed | partOpen | |
| ρ | mean air density in leak (kg/m3) | Rho | |
| Δp | dPtot | ||
| pplatf | static pressure at platform relative ambient pressure at reference level (Pa) | station.P | |
| prise | -g ·ρ station· hleak = stack pressure rise to leak (Pa) | ||
| pheight | PHeight | ||
| pwind | wind pressure outside leak (Pa) | PWindCalc | |
| hleak | leak height from floor of platform (m) | hLeak | |
| hfloor | platform level relative to reference level (m). | hFloor |
Given volume airflow (VFGiven)
The volume airflow is specified by a parameter Vf_Nom and achieved through a differential equation with a time constant (10 sec.)
where
| mdot | mass flow (kg/s) | inlet.m_dot | ||
| Vf_Nom | specified volume airflow ( m3/s) | VFNom | ||
| fcntr | control signal in interval [-1 : 1], -1 for reverse action | cntr | ||
| ρ | air density (kg/ m3) | Rho_tun1 | ||
| τ | time constant (s). | tau | ||
Filter (Filter)
The volume airflow is given by an input variable Vf_Filter and achieved through a differential equation with a time constant (10 sec.)
where
| mdot | mass flow (kg/s) | inlet.m_dot | ||
| Vf_Filter | specified volume airflow ( m3/s) | VFFilter | ||
| ρ | air density (kg/ m3). | Rho_tun1 | ||
Damper (Damper)
In the damper the pressure difference is described as a function of the mass flow. At fully open position the flow is governed by a loss coefficient and at closed by an Equivalent Leakage Area. The damper can be defined as asymmetric. In that case a different Equivalent Leakage Area is given for air flow in the opposite direction.
where
| mdot | mass flow (kg/s) | left.m_dot | |
| nAct | if powerLawLeakage then | nAct | |
| cAct | if mdot > 0 then else | cAct | |
| fclosed | - τopen ·dfclosed/dt + (1 - fopenSig) = delayed opening/closing | partClosed | |
| fopenSig | opening control, 1 for fully open and 0 for closed | partOpen | |
| τopen | time constant for opening/closing (s) | tau | |
| n | power law exponent at closed | n | |
| c | power law coefficient at closed | c | |
| k | integer exponent in linear combinations | k | |
| copen | | c_open | |
| cclosed | if powerLawLeakage then c else | c_closed | |
| cclosR2L | if powerLawLeakage or symmetric then cclosed else | c_closR2L | |
| Cd | discharge coefficient | cd | |
| Δp | static pressure difference between left and right (Pa) | dPtot | |
| ρair | density of air (kg/m3) | Rho_air | |
| kloss | loss coefficient at fully open | kLoss | |
| A | cross section area (m2) | tArea | |
| Ael | equivalent leakage area (m2) | ela | |
| AelR2L | equivalent leakage area for air flow from right to left if not symmetric (m2). | elaR2L |
Passage (Passage)
A model for parallel and/or serial doors for passenger passage has been implemented. Both stochastic and intermittent passenger flows are handled. We assume that a door section consists of a user defined number of doors and in the case of two serial door sections that these are far enough apart so that in the statistical treatment they can be considered as independent.
The relation between pressure difference and air mass flow through a passage is described by the equation
where
| Δp | static pressure difference between left and right (Pa) | dPtot | |
| mdot | mass flow, positive from left to right (kg/s) | left.m_dot | |
| cAct | coefficient (see below). | cAct |
For stochastic passenger flows we assume that the number of open doors in a door section is binomially distributed, i.e.
where
| f(i,p,n) | probability that i doors are open | ||
| n | number of doors in door section | ||
| p | time fraction when a door is open. |
For parallel doors (a left door section) we get
where
| cActS | the value of cAct in case of stochastic passenger flow | ||
| fL | vector with components f(i, pLnL) , i = 0, nL | ||
| nL | number of doors in left door section | nl | |
| cL | vector [ cclosedL ,{ copenL· i/ nL , i = 1, nL }]T | ||
| pL | time fraction when a door in left section is open (see below) | fOpenL | |
| cclosedL | |||
| copenL | |||
| Cd | discharge coefficient | cd | |
| ρair | density of air (kg/m3) | Rho_air | |
| klossL | loss coefficient at fully open left door section | kLossL | |
| A | cross section area (m2) | tArea | |
| AelL | equivalent leakage area in left door section (m2). | ela |
In the case with serial door sections (left and right door section) the expression for cActS becomes, with an analogous notation for the right door section (R for right)
where
| CLR | matrix with | ||
| fR | vector with components f(i, pRnR) , i = 0, nR | ||
| cR | vector [ cclosedR ,{ copenR· i/ nR , i = 1, nR }] T . |
The probability that a door is open (time fraction when a door is open) is given by
where
| τL | door opening time for single passenger in left door section (s) | tauL | |
| τR | door opening time for single passenger in right door section (s) | tauR | |
| qstoch | qsL + qsR stochastic passenger flow at rush hour (passengers/h) | passStoch | |
| qsL | stochastic passenger flow from left at rush hour (passengers/h) | passLeftStoch | |
| qsR | stochastic passenger flow from right at rush hour (passengers/h) | passRightStoch | |
| sτ | - τ ·dsτ /dt + s = delayed passenger flow fraction | passFrtau | |
| s(t) | passenger flow fraction relative rush hour passenger flow | passFract | |
| τ | time constant (s) | tau | |
| t | time (s). |
For intermittent passenger flow and parallel doors (left door section) we have
where
| cActP | the value of cAct during the intermittent passenger flow | ||
| ppulse | time fraction when all door sections are open for intermittent passenger flow | fOpenPulse | |
| qpulse | qpL + qpR = intermittent passenger flow at rush hour (passengers/h) | passPulse | |
| qpL | intermittent passenger flow from left at rush hour (passengers/h) | passLeftPulse | |
| qpR | intermittent passenger flow from right at rush hour (passengers/h) | passRightPulse | |
| qmax | user-defined passage capacity (passengers/h). | passMax |
The equation for ppulse takes into account that the intermittent flow is augmented by the simultaneous stochastic flow.
For serial door sections (left and right door sections) the expression for cActP becomes
.
The coefficient cAct for combination of the stochastic and intermittent passenger flows is evaluated as the mean value of cActS and cActP:
.
Axial fan (AxialFan)
The axial fan is described by a fan curve given as a spline, where pressure rise is given as a function of air volume flow
where
| Δp | static pressure difference between inlet and outlet ( Pa) | dPtot | ||
| Vf | air volume flow ( m3/s) | VFAir | ||
| fspline(Vf) | spline giving pressure rise as a function of air volume flow (Pa) | spline | ||
| fvAct | - τ ·dfvAct/dt + fvRel = delayed fvRel | speedAct | ||
| fvRel | quotient fan speed to nominal fan speed in interval [0 : 1] | speedRel | ||
| τ | time constant (s) | tau | ||
| ρ | air density (kg/m3) | |||
| ρnom | air density at which the fan performance is defined (kg/m3) | RhoNom | ||
| Qsup | max(0, Vf ;·Δp )/ eff = power supplied(W) | PowerSup [kW] | ||
| eff | espline(Vf / fvAct) = fan efficiency | effic | ||
| espline(Vf) | spline giving fan efficiency as a function of air volume flow. | spline | ||
Saccardo nozzle (SaccarNoz)
In the Saccardo nozzle the momentum of the supplied air is taken into account. Furthermore the pressure at location (3) of the supplied air is assumed to be the same as at the incoming (1).

where
| mdot_i | mass flow at location i (positive inward) (kg/s) | tuni.m_dot | |
| vi | velocity at location i (m/s) | VAiri | |
| pi | static pressure at location i (Pa) | tuni.P | |
| φ | angle between nozzle and main (rad) | Fi [degree] | |
| kmx | momentum exchange coefficient | Kmx | |
| A | cross section area of main (m2). | aTun12 |
Back to Start | Next (Calculation of heat flow)
{{/formula}}